Unit 2 Discussion Board 3
Think Tank Methods
Primary Response
ThienSi Le
CS875-1602C-01
Futuring
& Innovation
Dr. Imad Al Saeed
(25-April-2016)
(Source:
Adapted from fpcd.org, n.d.)
In Unit 2 Discussion Board 3 on the topic of “Think Tank Methods”, students are required to do research on a
concept of think tank methods. This short piece of writing will describe the think tank concept and discuss its models, methods and typical key points about them.
1. What is a think tank?
According to Caliva and Scheier (1992), a think
tank is an organization that conducts research and engages in advocacy. Think
tank is called as a reflection pool that includes a group of intellectual
experts and scholars who collectively perform research and develop reports and
recommendations on topics such as strategic planning, public policy. Its
purpose is, in general, assembling a group of experts together who reflect the
ideas on how to solve certain problem or issue (Stone, Fisher, Miller, & Sidney,
2006). The think tank’s service is usually funded by the government, corporate,
or special interest group such as political advocacy group but some independent
civil society think tanks are established as non-profit organizations.
The think tank participants often apply a process
that includes two approaches: (1) in-depth and (2) beyond the individual and
immediate. In the in-depth technique, they seek to analyze potential factors
and proposed solutions. In the technique of beyond the individual and immediate,
they are willing to sacrifice quick and concrete solutions in favor of the
longer term benefits and visionary ideas for a future. The think tank process
goes beyond “how” to “why” and beyond “what” to “what if” (Caliva et al.,
1992).
The most-cited think tanks in the US in the order
from high to low ratings are the Brookings Institution, the Council on Foreign
Relations, the American Enterprise Institute, the Heritage Foundation, and the
Center for Strategic and International Studies (Mendizabal, 2011).
2. Management of the think
tanks
In general, the think tank models for willing of
learning and solving problems lie in many forms. These forms are workshops,
conferences, consultations, seminars, brainstorming, and materials related to
specific wisdom. People may seek consultancy, influencing, advocacy and
independent research:
- Consultancy is the work of
consultations done by a commission from specific clients to address one or two
major questions. Consultancies often respond to an existing agenda.
- Advocacy is the influencing
work done by communications, capacity development, networking, campaigns,
lobbying, etc. It can be research based on emerging evidence from
consultancies.
- Independent research is the
work done with core or flexible funding that allows participants the liberty to
choose their research questions and method. It could be long term big ideas
without policy relevance, but it may emphasize a major policy problem that
requires an in-depth research and action investment.
The think tank may use the following models:
a. Old time model
In ancient time, a think
tank method is simple when a small group of scholars who gather to address the
issue. They use the face-to-face method in meeting places such as the church or
Senate session. For example, under Roman Empire, senators might meet to address
or advice some solutions of the issue.
b. Telecommunication model
A diverse group of experts
may use other think tank method in the form of telecommunications such as
telephone, radio, telegraphs, Morse code, etc. to tackle the problem in the
late 20th century. Notice that telecommunication model is evolved from the old
time model.
c. One roof model
According to Whittenhauer (n.d.), the one roof
model is a think tank method of which members gather in one place for face-to-face
and immediate interaction under one roof to discuss the problem and find a
solution. They use the telephone and written correspondence when the cost of
travel prohibited the group from physically gathering in the last decades. The
one roof model is an effective think tank method when immediate interactive
conversation facilitates a heightened thought process.
d. Without walls model
The without walls model allows the diverse group
to assemble not under one roof. With the Internet and the World Wide Web, the
facilitator can communicate immediately through emails, Internet telephone,
social media, networking, and virtual forum in interactive mode at the quick,
effective and low-cost means. Notice that the think tank does not pay the
overhead costs such as computers and utilities spend funding in primary research
in the without walls model.
3. Think tank methods
Think tank methods are communication activities
for discussion and solving the problems or issues. Struyk (2002)
described eight typical think
tank methods with effective scale of importance from low (score 8) to high
(score 1) as listed in Table below:
Table: Typical Think Tank Methods
|
||
Methods
|
Scores
|
Note
|
Policy memos
|
2.1
|
Respondents
rated the importance of each method on a scale from 1 to 8, with 1 the most
preferred method.
Source: Johnson
(2000)
|
Public
conferences
|
2.5
|
|
Formal meetings
(with policymakers)
|
3.0
|
|
Informal
meetings
|
3.1
|
|
Policy issue
papers
|
3.2
|
|
Issue briefings
|
3.6
|
|
Parliamentary
hearings
|
4.3
|
|
Draft laws and white
papers
|
5.2
|
Some key points of these think
tank methods are:
- Policy memos: Staff writes and
edits the memo. Senior management does review. Publication person does layout
and key changes, then print and distribute to related people. Staff prepares
the mailing list, mailing labels and does stuffing envelopes.
- Meeting with policymakers:
Staff sets up time and arrange the meetings/
- Roundtable discussions: Staff
organizes the event including preparing and distributing invitation, sending
reminders, handling questions, and inviting key participants. Also, other
activities are refreshment and renting a place to hold the event.
- Seminar participation: Staff
prepares the presentation and participates in the conference, travel costs, and
costs of documents to be distributed.
- Newspaper articles: Public
relations staff identify a reporter who is willing to do an interview. A
researcher prepares a customized write-up with an “angle” likely to appeal to
the newspaper, and time to meet with the reporter and work further with the
reporter later.
The think tank methods are the most effective if the basic ground rules are
well established to promote an environment of cooperation and respect. For
instance, under one roof meeting, participants, who sit in the circle in an
atmosphere that boosts morale, productivity and staff retention, most likely
discuss and solve the problem effectively and dissuade rude and disparaging
comments. Struyk (2002) introduced eight management principles for managing
think tanks as follows:
(1) Employee motivation
(2) Quality of work
(3) Internal innovation
(4) Choosing the right team
leader
(5) External oversights
(6) Structure of the group
(7) Financial management
(8) Proper communication.
These principles are considered as the practical guidance for maturing
think tank organizations.
In summary, the writing
defined the concept of a think tank with its purposes and described the
in-depth and went beyond process. It highlighted four reflection pool models and
constructed typical think tank methods and emphasized their effectiveness in
applications.
(Source:
Adapted from thinktankwatch.com, 2016)
REFERENCES
Caliva, L., Scheier, I. (1992). The think tank
technique. Retrieved April 24, 2916 from
http://academic.regis.edu/volunteer/ivan/sect03/sect03b.htm
Johnson, E. 2000. “Think Tanks in Sub-Saharan
Africa.” In Think Tanks & Civil Societies, edited by J. G. McGann and R. K.
Weaver (465–90). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Mendizabal, E. (2011). On think tanks. Retrieved
April 24, 2916 from
https://onthinktanks.org/articles/different-ways-to-define-and-describe-think-tanks/
Stone, D., Fisher, F., Miller, G. &
Sidney, M. (2006). Handbook
of public policy analysis: theory, methods, and politics, New York, Marcel
Dekker Inc. 2006: 149–157
Struyk, R. (2002). Managing think tanks. Retrieved April 24, 2916 from
http://www.resultsfordevelopment.org/sites/resultsfordevelopment.org
/files/Managing%20Think%20Tanks%20(Second%20edition).pdf
Whittenhauer, K. (n.d.). Effective think tank
methods. Retrieved April 24, 2916 from
http://www.ehow.com/way_5728092_effective-think-tank-methods.html
Thanks for sharing such a beautiful blog.....
ReplyDeleteRobotics in Education